Non-profit organizations as public interest litigants
28. September 2022. 16:00
hybrid, in the Faculty Council Room and online via MS Teams
2022. September 28. 16:00 -
hybrid, in the Faculty Council Room and online via MS Teams
Discussants: Bernadette Somody and Dalma Dojcsák
The discussion is led by Eszter Bodnár.
Registration
Registered participants receive the paper and (in case of online participation) the link for the event.
The organizations that we call “public interest organizations” make significant contributions to the development of legal doctrine. They initiate cases, intervene to make legal arguments, and, occasionally, participate in proceedings as amici curiae. Depending on the nature of their participation in a court case, they may add nuance to arguments made by the principal parties, obtain a far-reaching remedy, or substantially change the law.
The function of public interest law has traditionally been understood as “the representation of the underrepresented”. However, the legal frameworks that determine which organizational litigants should be entitled to appear before courts in public interest cases in Anglo-Commonwealth jurisdictions pay little attention to representativeness. Courts commonly assume that “public interest organizations” are internally democratic, and that they adequately represent the constituencies on whose behalf they purport to speak. However, non-profit law and the law of charities provide little foundation for these assumptions. This paper considers the messy representative role of non-profit organizations in public interest litigation, and its relationship with arguments about whether public interest litigation is ‘legitimate’ or ‘fair’.